How long you have to claim compensation for a flight in Cyprus
6 years is Cyprus’s general limitation period for a contract claim, and it is the figure Cypriot law supplies for an EU261 claim unless something shorter governs. Cyprus also applies the Montreal Convention’s 2-year limit, and no Cypriot ruling was found saying whether that shorter period reaches EU261 compensation. Two years is therefore the safer deadline to work to.
#How long do you have to bring an EU261 claim in Cyprus?
6 years is Cyprus’s general limitation period for a contract claim, under article 7(1) of the Limitation of Actionable Rights Law 66(I)/2012. Cyprus also applies the Montreal Convention’s 2-year limit, and no Cypriot ruling was found confirming whether that shorter period reaches EU261 compensation, so two years is the safer working deadline.
The statute puts the general rule plainly: “no action concerning a contract may be brought after the lapse of six years.” EU261 sets no deadline of its own. The CJEU held in Cuadrench Moré (C-139/11, 2012) that each Member State’s rules on limitation of actions fill that gap, and in Cyprus the general contract rule is where the search starts.
That figure carries a source caveat worth knowing. The text was read on cylaw.org, the Cyprus Bar Association’s legal database, not a government domain. The Cyprus Law Office’s own official site names that database as its recommended source for Cypriot legislation, and the wording was cross-checked against a scan of the law as enacted in the Official Gazette, hosted on the same database. And neither the provision we read nor any other source we hold says from which day the six years run for a flight claim.
Source: Limitation of Actionable Rights Law 66(I)/2012 art. 7(1) - cylaw.org, corroborated via law.gov.cy; CJEU C-139/11, Cuadrench Moré - eur-lex.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-18.
Do not treat six years as settled until you have read the next section: a shorter, competing deadline may govern your claim.
#Could the Montreal Convention’s two years apply instead?
2 years is the Montreal Convention’s deadline to sue under article 35(1), counted from arrival, from the date the aircraft ought to have arrived, or from the day carriage stopped. Cyprus applies the Convention as well, and no Cypriot ruling was found confirming or rejecting whether that same two years also bars an EU261 compensation claim.
Article 35 extinguishes a right to damages under the Convention. EU261 compensation is a sui generis payment owed under the Regulation itself, and the reasoning applied elsewhere in the EU suggests Montreal’s two years should not govern it. No Cypriot ruling testing that reasoning was found, so for Cyprus the question is genuinely open.
How courts in other EU countries have handled the same question, ruling by ruling and with sources, is set out on the Montreal Convention two-year limit page. None of those rulings binds a Cypriot judge, and this page does not borrow their answer.
The risk runs in one direction only. A claimant who files within two years loses nothing if a Cypriot court later confirms the six. A claimant who waits into the third year, relying on article 7(1), has no fallback if a court applies article 35 instead: the claim would be out of time, with nothing left to refile.
Source: Montreal Convention 1999 art. 35(1) - eur-lex.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-15; no Cypriot ruling on this point was found, checked 2026-09-18.
Treat two years from your flight date as the deadline, not six, until a Cypriot ruling settles the question either way.
#Which flights does Cyprus’s deadline govern?
Every flight leaving Larnaca or Paphos is covered under article 3(1)(a) of EU261, whichever airline operates it. A flight into Cyprus from outside the EU is covered only when a Community carrier operates it, and not at all if you already received benefits, compensation and assistance in the third country you left.
The inbound test turns on the operating carrier’s licence, not on the airport where you land. A flight from Tel Aviv to Larnaca operated by a Community carrier sits inside the Regulation. The same flight on a carrier that is not a Community carrier sits outside it altogether.
Enforcement follows the same map. Under article 16(1), Cyprus’s enforcement body is responsible for flights from Cypriot airports and for flights from third countries into them. A flight that reached Paphos from Athens or Vienna is a departure from another Member State, so that state’s body carries the enforcement responsibility, although article 16(2) lets a passenger complain to any designated body about an infringement at a Member State airport. The Commission’s list of national enforcement bodies names each one.
Source: EU261 art. 3(1)(a)-(b), art. 16(1)-(2) - eur-lex.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-15.
Find the operating carrier on your booking before you work out which deadline, if any, applies.
#Who handles a complaint in Cyprus, and does their process have a deadline?
8 weeks is how long the airline gets to answer your written complaint before Cyprus’s Department of Civil Aviation will accept one. The DCA’s own page says its administrative process has “no deadline”, which describes the DCA’s procedure only, not the court period of six years or, on the safer view, two.
The Department of Civil Aviation (DCA) is Cyprus’s national enforcement body under article 16 of EU261, and it appears on the Commission’s list of enforcement bodies updated 27 August 2026. Its complaint page sets the order of steps: a written complaint to the airline, eight weeks for the airline to reply, and only then a complaint to the DCA.
The phrase “no deadline” is where readers go wrong. It tells you the DCA will still look at an old complaint. It says nothing about how long a Cypriot court will hear a claim, and nothing in the DCA’s material says an open complaint pauses the court period. Two clocks run here, and only the DCA’s one has no end date.
Source: Department of Civil Aviation, complaint procedure - mcw.gov.cy; European Commission, National Enforcement Bodies (updated 27 August 2026) - transport.ec.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-18.
Send the written complaint, note its date, and mark the day eight weeks later as the first day the DCA route opens.
#What to do before the deadline runs out
2 years from your flight date is the date to diary in Cyprus, whatever the DCA is doing with your file. Write to the airline now, keep proof of the day you sent it, and after eight weeks choose between a DCA complaint and a court claim with that two-year date in view.
The letter needs the flight number and date, what went wrong, and the amount you are claiming under EU261. Its dated copy is your record of when the eight weeks began. Once that window has passed, the DCA route opens; a court claim is a separate decision, and no source makes a DCA complaint a condition of going to court.
Working to two years costs nothing if six turns out to be right. It protects the claim if a court applies article 35 of the Montreal Convention. The small claims routes used across Europe explain the lower-cost court options, and Cyprus’s figures sit beside every other country’s on flight compensation time limits.
General information about EU261 claims in Cyprus, not legal advice. For your specific case: the Department of Civil Aviation or a lawyer in Cyprus.
Diary the two-year date today, before you send anything, so no reply from the airline or the DCA can carry you past it.
#Sources
- Limitation of Actionable Rights Law 66(I)/2012, art. 7(1) - cylaw.org, checked 2026-09-18.
- CJEU C-139/11, Cuadrench Moré - eur-lex.europa.eu.
- Montreal Convention 1999, art. 35(1) - eur-lex.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-15.
- Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, arts. 3, 16 - eur-lex.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-15.
- Department of Civil Aviation, complaint procedure - mcw.gov.cy, checked 2026-09-18.
- European Commission, National Enforcement Bodies — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (updated 27 August 2026) - transport.ec.europa.eu, checked 2026-09-15.